qordata
  • Products
    • Reporting
    • Transparency Reporting Solution
    • Monitoring
    • Compliance Central
    • Expense Monitoring & Auditing Solution (EMA)
    • Process
    • EngageAgent
    • Grants & Sponsorship Management Solution
  • Thought Leadership
    • Surveys and Insights
    • Whitepapers
    • Case Studies
    • Webinars
    • Blogs
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Leadership Team
    • Our Partners
    • Contact Us
(609) 375-0010
Request a Demo
Reporting Transparency Reporting Solution Monitoring Compliance Central Expense Monitoring & Auditing Solution (EMA) Process EngageAgent Grants & Sponsorship Management Solution
Surveys and Insights Whitepapers Case Studies Webinars Blogs
About Us Leadership Team Our Partners Contact Us
(609) 375-0010 Request a Demo
Cookie Preferences We use cookies We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, personalise content, and analyse traffic. You can accept all cookies or manage your preferences.
Cookie Preferences

Manage your preferences

Choose which categories of cookies you're comfortable with. You can change this anytime by revisiting this banner.

Necessary Required for the site to run. Cannot be turned off.
Always Active
Analytics Helps us understand how visitors use the site.
Marketing Used to personalise content and measure campaign performance.
CMS Audit Risk · Data Analysis

Which Physicians and Hospitals Show the Biggest CMS Payment Spikes

Concentration is flat and not the story. A small, specialty-concentrated group of physicians and hospitals drives the spikes that matter.

Published September 19, 2026 · qordata Compliance Intelligence

Across the full 2023-2025 CMS Open Payments dataset, the top 1% of paid physicians receive roughly two-thirds of all General Payment dollars, and that share barely moves year to year. That's not the story. The story is a much smaller group of physicians and hospitals whose payments jump suddenly, and where those jumps concentrate.

Using a conservative threshold, a prior-year payment of at least $1,000 with a current-year increase of at least 200% and at least $5,000 in absolute dollars, qordata's analysis of the full three-year Open Payments files found 5,544 physicians flagged in 2024 and 6,197 in 2025. That's about 3.7% of eligible physicians each year, against a typical physician's actual median year-over-year change of negative 14.3%.

Key takeaways
  • Concentration is flat. The top 1% of physicians hold roughly two-thirds of General Payment dollars in every year measured, a structural pattern, not a spike.
  • 3.7% of physicians were flagged for a 200%+ year-over-year increase in both 2024 and 2025, representing over $256M and $271M in combined flagged growth.
  • Orthopaedic surgery alone drove $75.8 million of the 2024 total, 29.6%, across 369 physicians, more than seven times the next largest specialty.
  • The same shape shows up at named teaching hospitals, publicly identifiable in CMS's own data.

Start with the baseline: concentration isn't the story

High concentration in Open Payments data is easy to mistake for a red flag. It isn't one on its own. The top 1% of paid physicians consistently receive roughly two-thirds of all General Payment dollars across 2023, 2024, and 2025, a share that barely moves. That pattern is driven by royalty and licensing payments to a small number of physician-inventors, people who hold patents on devices or techniques and are compensated accordingly. It's a structural feature of how the industry pays a handful of specialists, not evidence of anything improper.

The signal worth watching is different: sudden, large, year-over-year increases at the individual or institution level.

Where the spikes actually concentrate

2024 flagged year-over-year increase by physician specialty
$0M$20M$40M$60M$80M Orthopaedic Surgery$75.8MInternal Medicine$10.8MOphthalmology$9.8MGastroenterology$8.8MDermatology$8.3MCardiovascular Disease$7.3M 2024 flagged dollar increase ($M)
Source: qordata analysis of CMS Open Payments General Payment files, program years 2023-2024. Flagged = prior-year payment of at least $1,000, current-year increase of at least 200% and at least $5,000 in absolute dollars.

It isn't spread evenly across specialties. In the 2024 cohort, orthopaedic surgery alone accounts for $75.8 million of the $256.4 million in flagged increases, 29.6% of the total, across 369 physicians. That's more than seven times the next largest specialty, internal medicine, at $10.8 million.

The same pattern at the hospital level

Institution-level spikes follow the same shape, and they're fully public and directly citable in CMS's own data, not an inference from aggregated figures.

Named teaching-hospital payment spikes
0%200%400%600%800% Wadley Regional Medical Center2023 -> 2024+802%Waterbury Hospital2024 -> 2025+604%Christ Hospital2023 -> 2024+378% Year-over-year increase in payments (%)
Source: CMS Open Payments General Payment files, by reporting entity, program years 2023-2025.

Wadley Regional Medical Center rose 802% from 2023 to 2024. Waterbury Hospital rose from $3,236 to $1,956,762 between 2024 and 2025, a 604% increase spread across 19 different reporting entities and 55 separate payments. Christ Hospital rose 378% over the same period, across 12 payers and 134 payments. In every case, the shape is the same: a sudden, large, multi-payer increase, not one outsized transaction that would be easy to explain away.

Why this matters for your audit risk

CMS's own audit guidance, Open Payments: Audit Best Practices 2026, names entity size as one of the factors behind issue-based selection. A sudden, large, multi-payer increase to a specific physician or hospital is precisely the shape of pattern a compliance officer should be able to explain before an auditor asks about it.

Why the specialty concentration matters: Knowing that spikes cluster hard in specific specialties, rather than spreading randomly, changes how you benchmark your own payee base. A single large increase in a specialty like orthopaedic surgery is part of an industry-wide pattern; the same increase in a specialty where it's rare deserves a closer look.

What to check in your own payee base

  1. Run every Healthcare Professional (HCP) and Healthcare Organization (HCO) in your reporting entity against the same criteria: at least $1,000 in the prior year, at least a 200% increase, and at least $5,000 in absolute growth.
  2. Flag anyone who clears that bar for a documented explanation on file, before an auditor requests one.
  3. Check whether flags cluster in one specialty. If they do, confirm whether that matches the national pattern or stands out from it.
  4. Cross-reference against your removed/deleted rate. A spike combined with a later correction is a pattern worth a closer look on its own.
Related
CMS Open Payments Data Corrections Jumped Almost 179x in One Year
Benchmark your own payee base against the national data
The full CMS Audit Risk Report includes the exact spike methodology, the complete specialty and hospital breakdowns, and a checklist for reviewing your own reporting entity against all three national signals.
Download the CMS Audit Risk Report

Frequently asked questions

Is high payment concentration in CMS Open Payments a red flag?

Not by itself. The top 1% of paid physicians receive roughly two-thirds of all General Payment dollars in every year from 2023 to 2025, and that share is flat. It's driven by royalty and licensing payments to a small number of physician-inventors, a structural feature of the data, not a warning sign on its own.

What counts as a payment spike in CMS Open Payments data?

qordata's analysis used a conservative bar: a prior-year payment of at least $1,000, a current-year increase of at least 200%, and at least $5,000 in absolute dollar growth. Against a typical physician's actual median year-over-year change of negative 14.3%, that flagged 5,544 physicians in 2024 and 6,197 in 2025.

Which physician specialty drives the most flagged payment growth?

Orthopaedic surgery. In the 2024 cohort, 369 orthopaedic surgeons alone accounted for $75.8 million of the $256.4 million in flagged increases, 29.6% of the total and more than seven times the next largest specialty.

How can a compliance team benchmark its own payee base against these spikes?

Run every HCP and HCO in your reporting entity against the same criteria: a 200%+ year-over-year increase with at least $5,000 in absolute growth. Flag anyone who clears that bar for a documented explanation, especially if they cluster in one specialty. qordata's CMS Audit Risk Report includes the full methodology, and qordata's CARE team can run this benchmark against your own data directly.

qordata · AI-Enhanced Compliance Solutions
Download the CMS Audit Risk Report

Enter your details and we'll send the full report straight to your inbox.

0
Skip to Content
qordata
qordata
qordata — data driven compliance
(609) 375-0010 103 Carnegie Center Drive, Suite 300, Princeton, NJ 08540
Products
  • Transparency Reporting Solution
  • Compliance Central
  • Expense Monitoring & Auditing (EMA)
  • EngageAgent
  • Grants & Sponsorship Management
Thought Leadership
  • Surveys and Insights
  • Whitepapers
  • Case Studies
  • Webinars
  • Blogs
Company
  • About Us
  • Leadership Team
  • Our Partners
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
© qordata 2026. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy Terms of Use Sitemap Cookie Preferences